Want a clue about health care costs in advance? New tools take a crack at it

Want a clue about health care costs in advance? New tools take a crack at it

Require healthcare procedure in the new yr and want to nail down your out-of-pocket fees prior to you stroll into the doctor’s office environment? There’s a new instrument for that, at minimum for insured clients.

As of Jan. 1, wellness insurers and employers that provide health ideas have to supply on the net calculators for sufferers to get detailed estimates of what they will owe — getting into account deductibles and copayments — for a selection of companies and prescription drugs.

It can be the latest exertion in an ongoing movement to make charges and upfront cost comparisons probable in a small business acknowledged for its opaqueness.

Insurers ought to make the cost information and facts accessible for 500 nonemergency companies viewed as “shoppable,” meaning people commonly have time to contemplate their alternatives. The federal requirement stems from the Transparency in Coverage rule finalized in 2020.

So how will it work?

Patients, understanding they have to have a distinct remedy, drug, or clinical service, very first log on to the price tag estimator on a web site offered by their insurance provider or, for some, their employer. Subsequent, they can search for the treatment they have to have by billing code, which quite a few patients may not have or by a general description, like “mend of knee joint,” or “MRI of abdomen.” They can also enter a hospital’s or physician’s identify or the dosage amount of a drug for which they are trying to find value info.

Not all prescription drugs or solutions will be offered in the 1st yr of the tools’ rollout, but the expected 500-product list handles a extensive swath of professional medical providers, from zits operation to X-rays.

Once the information is entered, the calculators are supposed to create true-time estimates of a patient’s out-of-pocket cost.

Setting up in 2024, the necessity on insurers expands to include all prescription drugs and products and services.

These estimator-resource demands arrive on best of other cost facts disclosures that turned powerful for the duration of the previous two several years, which have to have hospitals and insurers to publicly post their prices, together with individuals negotiated involving them, together with the price for money-spending or uninsured patients.

Still, some hospitals have not thoroughly complied with this 2021 disclosure directive and the insurance company info produced in July is so voluminous that even researchers are acquiring it cumbersome to obtain and analyze.

The selling price estimator applications may well support fill that gap.

The new estimates are personalized, computing how substantially of an annual deductible sufferers continue to owe and the out-of-pocket restrict that applies to their coverage. The amount the insurer would pay out if the services had been out of network ought to also be revealed. People can ask for to have the information and facts delivered on paper, if they favor that to on the web.

Insurers or businesses who fall short to offer the tool can confront penalty fines of at minimum $100 a day for every single man or woman afflicted, a considerable incentive to comply — if enforced.

And there are caveats: Shoppers making use of the applications ought to be enrolled in the respective overall health prepare, and there is no guarantee the final price will be exactly as shown.

That’s because “unexpected components throughout the study course of treatment, which may perhaps require supplemental services or vendors, can final result in greater precise charge sharing liability,” federal regulators wrote in outlining the policies.

Insurers will not be held liable for incorrect estimates.

Because the price tag estimates may perhaps nicely vary from the last rate, both for the reason that the technique was extra intricate than at first predicted, or was handled by a distinct service provider at the past minute, one possibility is that “I could possibly get a bill for $4,000 and I am heading to be upset mainly because you instructed me $3,000,” said Gerard Anderson, a professor of health and fitness coverage and administration and of worldwide wellness at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Lots of insurers have presented versions of charge-estimator instruments before, but compact percentages of enrollees in fact use them, studies have revealed.

Federal regulators defended the requirement for estimator instruments, producing that even nevertheless several insurers experienced provided them, the new rule sets distinct parameters, which might be much more thorough than previously versions.

In outlining the ultimate rule, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Solutions pointed out that some previous calculators “on the sector only offer large-variety estimates or typical estimates of pricing that use historic statements information” and did not constantly consist of facts about how a lot the patient experienced accrued toward an yearly deductible or out-of-pocket limit.

The agency says these types of rate disclosure will help people today comparison-shop and may possibly ultimately help slow climbing clinical costs.

But that is not a supplied.

“CMS has a lot of men and women who imagine this will make a substantial impact, but they also have a very long time frame,” claimed David Brueggeman, director of industrial health and fitness at the consulting business Guidehouse.

In the limited time period, benefits may well be more challenging to see.

“Most sufferers are not going en masse to use these instruments,” said Dr. Ateev Mehrotra, a professor of well being treatment policy at Harvard Clinical School.

There are numerous factors, he stated, such as minimal economical incentive if they deal with the similar dollar copayment irrespective of whether they go to a really pricey facility or a a lot less expensive a single. A far better way to get people to swap to lessen-charge providers, he claimed, is to build pricing tiers, satisfying clients who look for the most value-effective suppliers with decreased copayments.

Mehrotra is skeptical that the expense estimator applications alone will do much to dent growing healthcare price ranges. He’s additional hopeful that, in time, the necessity that hospitals and insurers post all their negotiated selling prices will go even more to slow expenditures by showcasing which are the most high-priced providers, along with which insurers negotiate the greatest premiums.

Even now, the cost-estimator applications could be valuable for the growing number of people with substantial-deductible wellbeing programs who shell out immediately out-of-pocket for significantly of their overall health treatment in advance of they strike that deductible. Through that period, some may perhaps conserve considerably by browsing all around.

All those deductibles incorporate “force on individuals to store on price tag,” stated Brueggeman, at Guidehouse. “Irrespective of whether they are actually performing that is up for debate.”


KHN (Kaiser Health and fitness News) is a nationwide newsroom that provides in-depth journalism about health and fitness concerns. With each other with Policy Analysis and Polling, KHN is one particular of the 3 significant operating systems at KFF (Kaiser Spouse and children Foundation). KFF is an endowed nonprofit corporation offering information on overall health problems to the country.

Filling gaps in care: Improving access to trusted information outside the doctor’s office

Filling gaps in care: Improving access to trusted information outside the doctor’s office

Around the earlier several a long time, the medical doctor-client partnership has undeniably transformed all around the globe. As many have started to argue that normal touchpoints like the yearly actual physical are starting to be obsolete, the moments wherever a patient has the opportunity to acquire steerage on their health from a source they have faith in grow to be more and more sporadic.

But for the duration of the weeks, months, or several years concerning visits, where do sufferers go to find answers to their wellbeing concerns? Online sources, buddies, household, social media, and information shops weave a patchwork of facts that guides our wellness conclusions day-to-day – nonetheless the trouble lies in comprehension which of these resources is credible. This is specially legitimate when we look at persons in beneath-resourced teams who, provided various cultural and socioeconomic components, mostly rely on the data accessible inside their current ecosystems.

Far more and a lot more, we’re seeing that entry to superior-high quality, useful data is found to be a social determinant of overall health, as it impacts results at the two the specific and the local community level. Not only does it impact one’s choices about when and exactly where they seek care, but also how they devote in items or select a well being plan, and no matter if they understand the advanced subjects similar to their wellbeing.

When we think about how exposure to misinformation or falsehoods can misguide individuals, it underscores the duty that we as providers have to guarantee we ourselves understand where by these sources lie, and how to use them as component of our follow.

But this is a new way of working. For decades, several of us in healthcare have been resistant to considering about how people obtain information. We acquire a complicated procedure and, in its place of breaking it down, we inquire sufferers to action into our environment crammed with jargon and paywalled investigate. When a individual leaves the emergency department, they are handed a long printout of discharge guidance, but they may perhaps not fully grasp the phrases or be ready to absorb it.

Further than this, there has also usually been a broader need for the shared experiences from sufferers or caregivers who have navigated a related health and fitness journey. We see this for people today across all walks of lifetime – no matter if it be a female who gets a cancer analysis and does not know who to question about the treatment practical experience, or a teenage boy who is silently struggling from melancholy and feels too anxious to switch to household or close friends with his feelings.

One particular of the lessons that we all acquired during the pandemic is that we require to believe tough not only about wherever and how a wellness information is shared, but who is sharing it. Who do folks believe in to listen to distinct items of information and facts from, and what format is most efficient in generating that stick? How can we build an ecosystem that permits patients to obtain answers, so they know how to just take treatment of on their own and what to watch for as they recover?

As a system that reaches billions of people every single month, we at YouTube understand the prospect we have to enjoy a position in answering that problem. This is specially important for BIPOC and underrepresented teams, who have been systematically underserved for a long time, ensuing in a deep-rooted mistrust in America’s health-related gurus and institutions. This is why we have spent the past two decades prioritizing our efforts all-around wellbeing info. From partnerships to create suggestions and rules with the world’s main well being organizations and providers, to dedicated teams that make certain the thoughts that men and women are looking for are answered in a way that is both participating and factual, to attributes that assist customers differentiate this articles from the floods of other movies on the platform – all working in the direction of our intention to rethink the position that our system has to perform in the public wellbeing ecosystem.

Even more, as the inequities in our international health care program were being laid bare more than the previous couple a long time, we’ve labored to establish how we can build a content ecosystem that is personalized toward closing these gaps in treatment. This calendar year, in partnership with the Kaiser Household Foundation, we introduced alongside one another a few exceptional businesses that are undertaking the do the job on the floor in these communities – the Loveland Foundation, the Nationwide Start Fairness Collaborative (NBEC) and the Satcher Wellness Leadership Institute at Morehouse Faculty of Drugs – and have presented every with seed funding and online video creation expertise, alongside with data and study, to assist them establish a existence on YouTube that reaches audiences at-scale.

At a global amount, health treatment methods, suppliers, govt entities, engineering organizations, non-gain organizations and church buildings all want to imagine of how data drives health and fitness results, and how we rethink overall health communications to set up a seamless world wide web of credible data, connecting the dots for all people.


Sponsored by

youtube

Find out more about YouTube Wellness in this article.

Access and Coverage for Mental Health Care: Findings from the 2022 KFF Women’s Health Survey

Access and Coverage for Mental Health Care: Findings from the 2022 KFF Women’s Health Survey

Vital Takeaways

  • A noticeably bigger share of women (50{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) than guys (35{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) thought they required psychological wellness providers in the past two decades. Amid those who considered they essential mental wellbeing care, about six in ten women of all ages and guys sought treatment in the previous two yrs.
  • Just about two-thirds of youthful gals ages 18-25 report needing mental wellbeing care in the earlier two decades in comparison to one-3rd of women of all ages ages 50-64.
  • Among the all ladies ages 18-64 who believed they desired mental wellness services in the past two a long time, just half attempted and had been ready to get an appointment for psychological wellbeing treatment, 10{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} tried out but were being not able to get an appointment, and 40{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} did not request treatment.
  • Nearly 50 percent of girls who wanted mental overall health products and services and tried using to get care were being ready to get an appointment inside of a thirty day period, but more than just one-third of females experienced to wait around much more than a thirty day period. Among individuals who could not get an appointment, ladies cite limited supplier availability and cost as the key explanations they have been unable to obtain mental well being care.
  • Two in 10 privately insured females with a mental overall health appointment in the earlier two many years say their service provider did not acknowledge their insurance.
  • Sixty percent of gals had a telemedicine/telehealth go to in the past two a long time. Psychological well being care was the third most typical purpose girls cited for accessing telehealth/telemedicine providers, with 17{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} declaring it was the key intent of their most current telemedicine pay a visit to. The vast majority report that the excellent of their telehealth stop by was the exact same as an in-human being check out.

Introduction

Psychological overall health has emerged as a swiftly developing concern in recent years, with 90{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} of Americans indicating there is a mental well being disaster in a modern KFF-CNN poll. Girls knowledge various psychological health circumstances a lot more usually than adult men, and some also expertise psychological well being problems that are special to girls, these as perinatal despair and premenstrual dysphoric ailments that may well come about when hormone degrees alter. Info from the National Middle for Health and fitness Stats present that across all age groups, ladies were almost 2 times as possible to have despair and stress than adult males. The COVID-19 pandemic, the opioid epidemic, and racism are amongst frequently cited stressors that have exacerbated extensive-standing psychological health challenges and prompted developing demand from customers for psychological health and fitness providers in the previous two a long time, specifically among females.

This temporary delivers new facts from the 2022 KFF Women’s Health Study (WHS), a nationally representative survey of 5,145 women and 1,225 gentlemen ages 18-64 conducted mostly on line from May well 10, 2022, to June 7, 2022. In addition to several subject areas similar to reproductive health and perfectly-becoming, the survey questioned respondents about their experiences accessing mental well being providers in the previous two many years. This concern temporary offers KFF WHS data on mental wellbeing providers obtain between self-discovered women and guys ages 18-64, and it also normally takes a closer seem at mental overall health protection among the gals. People today of all genders, which include non-binary people today, had been requested these thoughts on the other hand, there are insufficient data to report on non-cisgendered men and women. See the Methodology section for aspects.

Utilization of Mental Wellness Products and services

Gender Distinctions

Fifty percent of gals ages 18-64 (50{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) assumed they needed psychological overall health services in the past two decades (Determine 1) and a considerably lesser share of males report they essential mental wellbeing care (35{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}).  Research have prolonged documented gender disparities in the premiums and forms of psychological wellness ailments. Amid those who imagined they essential care, nonetheless, identical fees of females and gentlemen report trying to get care. Sixty p.c of gals tried to make an appointment for psychological well being compared to 56{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} of adult men.

Will need and Care Trying to get

Approximately two thirds (64{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) of gals ages 18-25 believed they needed psychological health and fitness products and services at some issue in the previous two many years in comparison to just 35{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} of girls ages 50-64 (Determine 2). Previous results from the 2020 KFF WHS revealed that far more than half of females (51{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) mentioned that worry or pressure linked to the coronavirus had affected their psychological health. Other studies clearly show that younger grownups, especially gals, knowledgeable large incidence of depression and loneliness in the course of the early levels of the pandemic.

Extra than half of gals with low incomes (< 200{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} of the federal poverty level (FPL)) (55{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) and women with Medicaid coverage (58{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) thought they needed mental health care in the past two years compared to less than half (47{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) of women with higher incomes (≥ 200{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} FPL) and those with private insurance (includes employer-sponsored insurance and individually purchased insurance) (47{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}). The FPL in 2022 for an individual is $13,590 (Figure 2).

Among those who thought they needed mental health care, larger shares of women ages 26-35 (63{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) and women ages 36-49 (64{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) sought care compared to 55{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} of women ages 50-64. Larger shares of women enrolled in Medicaid (67{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) sought mental health services compared to women who have private insurance (58{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) and women who are uninsured (50{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) (Figure 3).

A significantly lower share of Asian/Pacific Islander women (40{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) say they needed mental health services at some point in the past two years than their White counterparts (50{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}). Although not statistically significant, smaller shares of Asian/Pacific Islander women report seeking care compared to White women (50{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} vs. 62{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}). While the pandemic fueled violence against Asians and subsequently worsened anxiety and mental health for many, studies have shown that Asians reported greater cultural barriers to help-seeking such as family stigma and concerns about “losing face.” Cultural barriers may influence perceived need of care in addition to help-seeking behaviors.

Although the self-reported need for mental health care did not differ between Hispanic and White women (both 50{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}), smaller shares of Hispanic women (56{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) sought care compared to White women (62{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}). Despite high rates of depression among Hispanic women, studies have shown that stigma and perceived discrimination in health care settings can contribute to underutilization of mental health services within Hispanic communities. Hispanic women also have the highest uninsured rate, which may limit their access to care.

Among the 50{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} of women who thought they needed mental health services, half (50{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) were able to get an appointment, while another 40{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} did not try to get mental health services (Figure 4). One in ten (10{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) who tried to get care were unable to make an appointment for mental health services. This suggests that the other half of women who report needing care may have unmet mental health needs.

Among all women who thought they needed mental health care and tried to get it in the past two years, nearly half (47{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) had to wait less than a month for an appointment (Figure 5). One-quarter (24{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) had to wait one to two months, and 13{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} had to wait more than two months to get care. The remaining 16{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} of those who sought mental health care could not get an appointment.

Among the 16{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} of women who needed care, sought care, and were unable to get an appointment for mental health services, the main reasons were limited provider availability and cost barriers. One-third of women who could not get an appointment say the main reasons were that they could not find a provider that was accepting new patients (33{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) or that they could not afford the cost of mental health services (33{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}). Eight percent could not get an appointment in a reasonable amount of time and six percent say they could not find a provider nearby. Another 6{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} say they could not get an appointment for another reason, such as not wanting to go in-person due to COVID-19.

Our findings on provider availability are consistent with other studies on mental health access. A report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office found that many consumers with health insurance faced challenges finding in-network care. The country also faces a workforce shortage of behavioral health professionals in addition to other challenges with health care infrastructure that exacerbates issues with accessibility.

Figure 5: Women Were Unable to Access Mental Health Care Largely Due to Cost Barriers and Limited Provider Availability

Cost and Coverage for Mental Health Services

Among those who sought care but could not get an appointment, one-third (33{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) say the main reason was that they could not afford it (Figure 5). Cost remains a barrier to mental health care access for some people with insurance and especially for those who lack coverage. Significantly larger shares of women who are uninsured (60{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) say they could not get an appointment due to affordability reasons, compared to those who have health insurance either through private plans (33{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) or Medicaid (30{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) (Figure 6). There were no significant differences between women who have private insurance and women covered by Medicaid.

These findings on cost barriers are consistent with current literature, which has found that along with provider availability, affordability is one of the most prevalent barriers to mental health care.

While federal laws require special insurance protections such as parity for mental health care, gaps in coverage remain. All state Medicaid programs provide coverage for mental health services, and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires most private insurers to cover mental health care. However, the scope of coverage varies, provider networks are limited in many plans, and mental health providers may not accept all insurance plans. Some mental health practitioners do not accept insurance of any kind.

While most privately insured women who received mental health services in the past two years say their provider accepted their insurance for their most recent mental health visit (81{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}), two in ten (19{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) say their provider did not. Among privately insured women who said their provider accepted their insurance, more than half report having out-of-pocket expenses for their most recent mental health visit. More than one-third (36{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) say their insurance covered the full cost and 52{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} say their insurance covered some of the cost. Three percent say their insurance did not cover any of the cost. (Figure 7).

Figure 7: Two in Ten Privately Insured Women Who Got Mental Health Care Say Their Provider Did Not Accept Their Insurance

The Affordable Care Act requires that enrollees in most private health insurance plans have the right to appeal denied claims, though some evidence suggests that many are unfamiliar with appeals processes or are unaware of this protection. Among privately insured women whose insurance was not accepted by their mental health provider, 27{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} filed a claim with the health insurance plan to try to get reimbursed for some or all the cost (data not shown).

Telehealth

Social distancing during the pandemic contributed to a sharp increase in the provision of telehealth services, widening the access of counseling, therapy, prescribing, and other services via remote methods such as video and telephone. The rapid expansion of telemedicine/telehealth over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic has broadened access to health care for many, including access to mental health services. Mental health services provided via telehealth include speaking to a mental health provider over telephone or video, or through online apps such as Talkspace.

Sixty percent of women ages 18-64 had a telemedicine/telehealth visit in the past two years. Among these women, 17{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} say the primary purpose of their most recent visit was for mental health services (Figure 8). Accessing mental health care services was the third most common reason for telehealth visits, following annual check-ups (18{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) and visits for minor illness or injury (18{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}). Three in ten women ages 18-25 (29{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) say their most recent telehealth visit was for mental health services compared to 20{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} of women ages 26 to 35, 18{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} of women ages 36 to 49, and 10{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} of women ages 50 to 64 and older. A larger share of White women (21{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) obtained mental health services at their most recent telehealth visit than Black women (13{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}), Hispanic women (14{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}), and Asian/Pacific Islander women (7{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}).

A larger share of women with Medicaid coverage (22{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) report that their most recent telemedicine or telehealth visit was for mental health services than women who are privately insured (15{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}).

A similar share of women living in rural (23{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) and urban/suburban (17{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) areas report that the primary purpose of their most recent telehealth or telemedicine visit was for mental health services.

The majority (69{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) of women who had a telehealth or telemedicine visit in the past two years for mental health care say the quality of care they received at their most recent visit was the same as an in-person visit for this type of care (Figure 9). One-in-five (19{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) report receiving better quality of care during their telehealth visit, while 12{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} report experiencing worse quality than an in-person visit. These findings suggest the quality of mental health care is typically not diminished when accessing care via telehealth.

Conclusion

The demand for mental health care continues to surge as wait lists for professional help grow. Recent reports reveal that mental health providers across the nation are facing an overwhelming demand for services, leaving many individuals without care. Our survey finds that among the half of women who report that they thought they needed mental health services in the past two years, only half got an appointment for care. Unmet mental health needs are known to affect the overall well-being and productivity of individuals, families, and society, and studies have consistently shown that women are disproportionately affected by these unmet needs. Data from the 2022 KFF WHS underscore that addressing issues with provider availability and cost could improve access to mental health care for some. Our findings suggest that affordability barriers are a substantial obstacle for uninsured women.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic and other changes in the health policy environment, larger shares of employers began expanding coverage of mental health services by including more providers for in-person and telehealth care. Telehealth and telemedicine services have been recognized as an evolving strategy to increase access to care and address health needs, including care for mental health. We found that most women who received mental health services via telehealth say the quality of care they received was the same as in-person care. Telehealth has and likely will continue to play a role in addressing mental health access concerns for women.

Despite federal and state laws intended to expand and strengthen coverage for mental health care, gaps in coverage and problems with affordability continue to hinder access to mental health services even for those with private insurance and Medicaid. Our survey finds that in addition to challenges obtaining services, many women who have insurance faced at least some out-of-pocket costs for their visit. The findings from the 2022 KFF WHS suggest that future policies affecting telehealth, provider availability, health insurance coverage, and affordability will play a significant role in addressing the demand for mental health care.

Molnupiravir plus usual care versus usual care alone as early treatment for adults with COVID-19 at increased risk of adverse outcomes (PANORAMIC): an open-label, platform-adaptive randomised controlled trial

Molnupiravir plus usual care versus usual care alone as early treatment for adults with COVID-19 at increased risk of adverse outcomes (PANORAMIC): an open-label, platform-adaptive randomised controlled trial

Summary

Background

The safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of molnupiravir, an oral antiviral medication for SARS-CoV-2, has not been established in vaccinated patients in the community at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. We aimed to establish whether the addition of molnupiravir to usual care reduced hospital admissions and deaths associated with COVID-19 in this population.

Methods

PANORAMIC was a UK-based, national, multicentre, open-label, multigroup, prospective, platform adaptive randomised controlled trial. Eligible participants were aged 50 years or older—or aged 18 years or older with relevant comorbidities—and had been unwell with confirmed COVID-19 for 5 days or fewer in the community. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 800 mg molnupiravir twice daily for 5 days plus usual care or usual care only. A secure, web-based system (Spinnaker) was used for randomisation, which was stratified by age (<50 years vs ≥50 years) and vaccination status (yes vs no). COVID-19 outcomes were tracked via a self-completed online daily diary for 28 days after randomisation. The primary outcome was all-cause hospitalisation or death within 28 days of randomisation, which was analysed using Bayesian models in all eligible participants who were randomly assigned. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 30448031.

Findings

Between Dec 8, 2021, and April 27, 2022, 26 411 participants were randomly assigned, 12 821 to molnupiravir plus usual care, 12 962 to usual care alone, and 628 to other treatment groups (which will be reported separately). 12 529 participants from the molnupiravir plus usual care group, and 12 525 from the usual care group were included in the primary analysis population. The mean age of the population was 56·6 years (SD 12·6), and 24 290 (94{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) of 25 708 participants had had at least three doses of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Hospitalisations or deaths were recorded in 105 (1{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) of 12 529 participants in the molnupiravir plus usual care group versus 98 (1{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) of 12 525 in the usual care group (adjusted odds ratio 1·06 [95{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc} Bayesian credible interval 0·81–1·41]; probability of superiority 0·33). There was no evidence of treatment interaction between subgroups. Serious adverse events were recorded for 50 (0·4{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) of 12 774 participants in the molnupiravir plus usual care group and for 45 (0·3{35112b74ca1a6bc4decb6697edde3f9edcc1b44915f2ccb9995df8df6b4364bc}) of 12 934 in the usual care group. None of these events were judged to be related to molnupiravir.

Interpretation

Molnupiravir did not reduce the frequency of COVID-19-associated hospitalisations or death among high-risk vaccinated adults in the community.

Funding

UK National Institute for Health and Care Research

Introduction

Early treatment of COVID-19 with direct-acting antiviral drugs in the community could plausibly prevent deterioration, speed up recovery, and reduce health-care use in the community, viral shedding, and, the need for hospital admission. Molnupiravir is an oral antiviral that was initially developed for influenza,

  • Toots M
  • Yoon JJ
  • Cox RM
  • et al.
Characterization of orally efficacious influenza drug with high resistance barrier in ferrets and human airway epithelia.